Search Overview
A Class III medical device manufacturer facing FDA compliance issues related to product development quality engineering needed a VP of Operations to implement ISO 13485 processes and lead site-level production. The role required leading hardware and firmware engineering teams through complex regulatory requirements, modernizing quality systems under FDA scrutiny, and driving cross-functional improvement initiatives. Beyond operational execution, the candidate needed the strategic vision to rebuild quality processes while maintaining production continuity for life-critical devices.
The Candidate Landscape
Hiring Criteria
The profile required all of these together.
This search required candidates at the rare intersection of Class III medical device operations experience, proven leadership of hardware and firmware engineering teams, and demonstrated success building or restructuring quality systems under FDA/ISO audit conditions. The 31→6→1 conversion reflects selective targeting for a high-stakes regulatory situation.
Key Insights
🏥 Class III Medical Device Operations
Life-critical devices (perfusion systems, surgical equipment, critical monitoring) operate under the highest regulatory scrutiny. Candidates needed operational experience where quality failures have immediate patient safety implications—a fundamentally different risk profile than Class I/II devices.
⚙️ Hardware + Firmware Engineering Leadership
The role required leading cross-disciplinary teams of hardware and firmware engineers through complex product development cycles. Candidates needed to speak both languages—understanding PCB design constraints and embedded systems architecture while driving operational excellence.
📋 ISO 13485 Quality Systems Expertise
Beyond compliance checkbox knowledge, candidates needed hands-on experience building or restructuring quality engineering processes under FDA audit conditions. The company's FDA issues required someone who could implement sustainable product development quality steps, not just manage existing systems.
Inside the Search
The Regulatory Context
The company was rebuilding product development quality processes under ISO 13485 while already under FDA scrutiny. Candidates needed proven experience navigating FDA observations, implementing corrective actions, and establishing sustainable quality engineering practices for life-critical devices.
Qualification Breakdown
- 31 executives with operations leadership in Class III medical device manufacturing
- 17 had built or restructured quality systems under FDA/ISO audit conditions
- 12 had led hardware and firmware engineering teams through regulatory cycles
- 6 met leadership capability, compensation expectations, and geographic requirements
Outcome & Track Record
The hired VP of Operations had brought multiple Class III products to market, from design controls through commercial launch, and had modernized quality processes in similar FDA response situations — leading hardware, firmware, quality, and regulatory teams through product development under regulatory constraints.
Critical Success Factors
- Systems Thinking: Ability to diagnose root causes in quality systems, not just address symptoms
- Lean Transformation Experience: Proven capability driving operational improvement during scale-up phases
- Team Alignment: Building cross-functional collaboration between engineering, quality, and regulatory teams
- Site Authority: Candidates drawn to decision-making autonomy and direct board interaction
- Regulatory Resilience: Comfort operating under FDA scrutiny while maintaining production
Candidate Motivations
Top candidates were attracted to:
- Opportunity to rebuild quality systems with executive sponsorship
- Midwest location with lower cost of living vs. Boston/California medtech hubs
- Site-level authority over operations, quality, and engineering alignment
- Challenge of maintaining production while implementing regulatory improvements
- Impact on patient safety through life-critical medical devices